Learning View Priors for Single-view 3D Reconstruction

CVPR 2019
1The University of Tokyo2RIKEN
Input
Input image
Prediction
Prediction
View Prior
Input
Input image
Prediction
Prediction
Image priors improve single-view 3D reconstruction by encouraging plausible views from any angle.

Highlights

  • The first work to improve single-view 3D reconstruction using image priors.
  • An adversarial framework for learning image priors.

Abstract

There is some ambiguity in the 3D shape of an object when the number of observed views is small. Because of this ambiguity, although a 3D object reconstructor can be trained using a single view or a few views per object, reconstructed shapes only fit the observed views and appear incorrect from the unobserved viewpoints. To reconstruct shapes that look reasonable from any viewpoint, we propose to train a discriminator that learns prior knowledge regarding possible views. The discriminator is trained to distinguish the reconstructed views of the observed viewpoints from those of the unobserved viewpoints. The reconstructor is trained to correct unobserved views by fooling the discriminator. Our method outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and natural image datasets; this validates the effectiveness of our method.

Results

Single-view training on the ShapeNet dataset

We use synthetic images rendered from 3D CAD models in the ShapeNet dataset [1].

In this experiment, we trained a 3D reconstruction model using a single view per object. The table below reports reconstruction accuracy measured by intersection over union (IoU). Our method differs from the baseline only in its use of view prior learning (VPL), which significantly improves performance.

airplanebenchdressercarchairdisplaylampspeakerriflesofatablephonevesselmean
Baseline
(w/o texture)
.479.266.466.550.367.265.454.524.382.367.342.337.439.403
Proposed
(w/o texture)
.513.376.591.701.444.425.422.596.479.500.436.595.485.505
Baseline
(w/ texture)
.483.284.544.535.356.372.443.534.386.370.361.529.448.434
Proposed
(w/ texture)
.531.385.591.701.454.423.441.570.521.508.444.601.498.513

The three largest categories in the ShapeNet dataset are airplane, car, and chair.

Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed

Our method is particularly effective for objects in the display and phone categories, whose simple silhouettes make their 3D shapes highly ambiguous.

Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed

Our method also works well for objects in the sofa and bench categories, whose elongated shapes are difficult to learn from a single view.

Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed

Multi-view training on the ShapeNet dataset

Our method also improves reconstruction when multiple views per object are available during training. As the table below shows, it consistently outperforms the baseline in mean reconstruction accuracy on the ShapeNet dataset.

Number of views per object2351020
Baseline.573.596.620.641.653
Proposed.583.600.624.644.655

When twenty views per object are used during training, our proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ShapeNet dataset.

MethodReconstruction accuracy (IoU)
Multi-view trainingPTN [2].574
NMR [3].602
Our best model.655
3D supervision3D-R2N2 [4].560
OGN [5].596
LSM [6].615
PSGN [7].640
VTN [8].641
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture
Input imageProposed w/o textureProposed w/ texture

Single-view training on the PASCAL dataset

The PASCAL dataset [9] consists of natural images with noisy annotations. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on this challenging dataset.

airplanecarchairmean
Category-agnostic modelsDRC [10].415.666.247.443
Baseline.440.640.280.454
Proposed.460.662.296.473
Category-specific modelsCSDM [11].398.600.291.429
CMR [12].46.64n/an/a
Baseline.450.669.293.470
Proposed.475.679.304.486
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed
Input imageBaselineProposed

Technical overview

The figure below shows reconstructions produced by a conventional method.

Input(A) Original View(B) Unobserved Views
Input imageReconstructed viewUnobserved view Unobserved view Unobserved view
Input imageReconstructed viewUnobserved view Unobserved view Unobserved view
Input imageReconstructed viewUnobserved view Unobserved view Unobserved view

The reconstructions look correct from the observed viewpoints (class A), but inaccurate from unobserved viewpoints (class B). We introduce a discriminator that distinguishes class A views from class B views. Through training, the discriminator learns a prior over plausible views. We train the reconstruction model to fool the discriminator, encouraging it to produce shapes that look plausible from any viewpoint.

More details can be found in the paper.

References

  1. A. Chang et al. "Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository." arXiv. 2015.
  2. X. Yan et al. "Perspective Transformer Nets: Learning Single-view 3D Object Reconstruction without 3D Supervision." NIPS. 2016.
  3. H. Kato et al. "Neural 3D Mesh Renderer." CVPR. 2018.
  4. C. Choy et al. "3d-r2n2: A unified approach for single and multi-view 3d object reconstruction." ECCV. 2016.
  5. M. Tatarchenko et al. "Octree generating networks: Efficient convolutional architectures for high-resolution 3d outputs." ICCV. 2017.
  6. A. Kar et al. "Learning a multi-view stereo machine." NIPS. 2017.
  7. H. Fan et al. "A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Image." CVPR. 2017.
  8. S. Richter et al. "Matryoshka Networks: Predicting 3D Geometry via Nested Shape Layers." CVPR. 2018.
  9. Y. Xiang et al. "Beyond pascal: A benchmark for 3d object detection in the wild." WACV. 2014.
  10. S. Tulsiani et al. "Multi-view supervision for single-view reconstruction via differentiable ray consistency." CVPR. 2017.
  11. A. Kar et al. "Category-specific object reconstruction from a single image." CVPR. 2015.
  12. A. Kanazawa et al. "Learning Category-Specific Mesh Reconstruction from Image Collections." ECCV. 2018.

Citation

@InProceedings{kato2019vpl,
    title={Learning View Priors for Single-view 3D Reconstruction},
    author={Hiroharu Kato and Tatsuya Harada},
    booktitle={The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
    year={2019}
}

Contact